Rallying to support worst town

7

THE people of Warrington have rallied to the town’s support following the controversial report from the Audit Commission criticising local public services.
warrington worldwide was inundated with emails and telephone calls from the moment the report of the Commission’s Comprehensive Area Assessment findings appeared yesterday (Wednesday) morning.
They came from civic leaders, politicians, business people, voluntary service representatives and ordinary men and women in the street.
Most condemned the Audit Commission for producing a flawed report – and many were critical of the national press for misinterpreting the report to brand Warrington “the worst town in the country.”
Ian Marks, (right) leader of Warrington Borough Council, described the CAA as “a shambles” and said the report offered an inconsistent snapshot that bore little resemblance to reality.
He said: “There is little consistency between what inspectors seem to have picked up from their paperwork and what is really happening on the ground. Not a single issue they have red-flagged matches what our residents tell us matter to them.
“All this begs the question whether there is any real correlation between a local person’s experience of what it’s really like to live and work in a place and the subjective judgement of an auditor in London.”
Colin Daniels, (left) chief executive of Warrington Chamber of Commerce and Industry, said: “The whole basis of the Audit Commission report is to say the least questionable. Unfortunately Warrington hit the headlines recently regarding the Ofsted Report on child protection but other recent independent reports have made clear that the town in terms of prosperity and economic activity is amongst the best in the country.”
Coun Bob Barr, a member of the borough council’s executive board, said: “Warrington’s economic success and relative prosperity work against us. It is very hard to get resources to deal with the pockets of unemployment, deprivation and ill health when most of the town is productive and economically successful.
“Unfortunately the fruits of that success are taken away and spent in other parts of the country. Despite that, projects such as Orford Park, the proposed developments around Gulliver’s World and the kickstart housing in the inner areas will all provide jobs and training. Unfortunately getting rid of deep rooted deprivation and inequalities isn’t something that gets solved in three years.”
David Mowat, (right) Prospective Conservative Parliamentary Candidate for Warrington South condemned the attack on Warrington and said the facts were quite different to what had been reported.
The 2009 Cities Outlook Report ranked Warrington 8th out of 64 major UK conurbations in terms of average prosperity level.
According to the Audit Commission itself, 59 per cent of Warrington 16-year-olds got five or more A*-C grades at GCSE level, putting Warrington in the top 10 per cent of LEAs in the country. Employment in the town was in the top quartile in England, with 83.1 per cent of working-age people economically active.
He added: “The Cheshire countryside around the town is amongst the most beautiful in the country. The Audit commission red flags were in specific areas, raising focused concerns about inequality rather than absolute measures.
“The national media got it wrong by interpreting these focused concerns in a sloppy way. It is wrong to say that our quality of life in Warrington is low. It is not.”
Borough councillor Paul Kennedy said: “I chose to live in Warrington in 1987 and I choose to remain living in Warrington. I was not wrong then and am not wrong now.

“Warrington gets a bad press because of Londoncentric reporters, many of

whom probably don’t know where Warrington is, let alone visit our town

to see for themselves.

“We all need to be careful, if we beat Warrington up, investors will go elsewhere.

“All of these reports and assessments are just a job creation

scheme, I never get excited when they award four stars and never get

downhearted when they award three red flags.“
warrington worldwide readers, commenting on the Audit Commission report, were massively critical of its findings. While they acknowledge Warrington had its problems, the majority dismissed the report as flawed.
Voters in an online poll on this website were also massively against the Commission’s report.
As reported here yesterday, the Warrington Partnership, representing all public services across the borough, is to make representations to the Audit Commission when a review of the national findings is carried out next year.


7 Comments
Share.

About Author

Experienced journalist for more than 40 years. Managing Director of magazine publishing group with three in-house titles and on-line daily newspaper for Warrington. Experienced writer, photographer, PR consultant and media expert having written for local, regional and national newspapers. Specialties: PR, media, social networking, photographer, networking, advertising, sales, media crisis management. Chair of Warrington Healthwatch Director Warrington Chamber of Commerce Patron Tim Parry Johnathan Ball Foundation for Peace. Trustee Warrington Disability Partnership. Former Chairman of Warrington Town FC.

7 Comments

  1. Having read all the comments on the forum and the front page story with interest ‘Anger over “red flag” report’, I have tried to look for the councils official response on their own website, I could not find any reference to the news story? As of now is Warrington-Worldwide now the official website of the council to receive information on news, good, bad or otherwise about how the Warrington Borough Council is performing?

  2. To Aview

    The official response from all public services in Warrington is listed top of the news items on the homepage of the council website: http://www.warrington.gov.uk/News/2009/December/CAA.aspx#0.

    As you will have seen from the news items on this site, and in the forum, the report is supposed to assess how all public services in the borough are performing, not just the council. As such, the media statement commenting on the report is from the police, NHS and representatives of the voluntary sector as well.

    Considering the inevitable ‘league table’ approach taken by the national media to label Warrington the worst town in the country, it’s so much more positive if the local media organisations can play a part in rallying the support and pride that local people clearly feel about the place where they live and work.

  3. The report does say, and I agree, that council investment has wrongly been prioritised in the south of the town in areas like Stockton Heath and Appleton to the detriment of north Warrington

  4. Quote Ian Marks “There is little consistency between what Inspectors seem to have picked up from their paperwork and what is really happening on the ground”.

    So,…. prospects for employment for people in the most deprived communities are in fact really good are they? The gap between rich and poor has not been widening, the lifespan of men in these areas is not really more than 8 years lower than in more prosperous areas? The lifespan for people overall in warrington is not lower than Englands average? Staff in the childrens protection unit do not have overloaded workloads? and the allocation of money to this dept has been adequate has it? there are no management issues? and there has been no risk whatever to the town’s most vunerable children?

    Quote, Ian Marks continued…..”Not a single issue they have red-flagged matches what our residents tell us matter to them”

    So,….nobody in Warrington is in the least bit concerned about the above points?

    Really???

Leave A Comment