Walton Hall: campaigners' new allegations

3

CAMPAIGNERS fighting the controversial plans to re-develop Warrington’s Walton Hall and Gardens as a hotel and conference centre have made new allegations.
They claim if the proposals go ahead on the lines suggested by the borough council, half the gardens and all the buildings on the estate would be handed over to hotel group Contessa – and that the company would be granted a 150-year lease on the property.
For the first 25 years they would pay a peppercorn rent of £1-a-year.
Members of the Save Walton Gardens Campaign say they are “speechless.”
They are particularly concerned at one clause in the proposed development agreement which appears to show that if Contessa failed to complete the project, the borough council would pay them for everything they had invested up to that point.
The group say: “Contessa are entering this at absolutely no financial risk at all.
“They are not paying for the buildings or the land and if they decide to pull out at any stage, Warrington Borough Council will pay to them what they have spent.”
The campaigners have made their new claims on the eve of a special meeting of the borough council’s environment and housing overview and scrutiny committee when members will consider a “call in” of the proposals by Coun Terry O’Neill, leader of the Labour group on the council.
He claims there has been a lack of or inappropriate consultation, that the decision to press on with the project has not been taken with a sufficient degree of openness, that the decision lacks clarity of aims and desired outcomes and because of a lack of alternative options.
The council says its draft master plan for Walton is the basis for public consultation. It has announced plans to set up a review group, including representatives of opponents of the scheme, to study the matter further.


3 Comments
Share.

About Author

Experienced journalist for more than 40 years. Managing Director of magazine publishing group with three in-house titles and on-line daily newspaper for Warrington. Experienced writer, photographer, PR consultant and media expert having written for local, regional and national newspapers. Specialties: PR, media, social networking, photographer, networking, advertising, sales, media crisis management. Chair of Warrington Healthwatch Director Warrington Chamber of Commerce Patron Tim Parry Johnathan Ball Foundation for Peace. Trustee Warrington Disability Partnership. Former Chairman of Warrington Town FC.

3 Comments

  1. They are not the only one’s who are speachless !!!!!!! No wonder Contessa haven’t already pulled out and are happy to sit and wait and put up with the delays, public outrage, call-in, alleged consultation and of course the fact that the council now ‘say’ they are happy to look into suggested alternative solutions and ideas, which of course will ineviatbly be manipulated (allegidely) so as to be not feasible or too ‘costly’ to the council. There are of course huge questions surrounding oddities with the costings/accounts figures that have been used to support the original proposals to get rid of the estate. The scrutiny committee should refer the whole thing to the FULL COUNCIL and not the small board of the Exec Committee !! Lack of consultation no longer seems to be the main issue here !!!

  2. Sack the entire Exec on

    This is unreal. Almost every work the council have uttered over the last two months have been complete lies. You have to read that report and question, who’s objectives seem more important? The people of Warrington?

Leave A Comment