Warrington-Worldwide.co.uk incorporates the Village Life, Culcheth Life, Frodsham Life & Lymm Life magazines.

Council approves Draft Local Plan – see how your councillor voted


VIDEO: Warrington Borough Council has approved its controversial Draft Local Plan, in a named vote, allowing members of the public to see how their elected representatives voted.

The proposal was approved with 33 voting in favour, 14 against and six abstaining. Those who abstained were Labour Councillors representing or close to the Peel Hall ward, which has been under threat of development for many years – and has not been removed from the draft plan.

Prior to the meeting a vocal band of protesters gathered outside the town hall, later moving to the rear, shouting, chanting and singing their disapproval.

The draft plan – which the borough council say has been drawn up in accordance with government planning guidance, and informed by feedback from more than 4,500 members of the public – aims to deliver 18,900 new homes (or 945 per year), until 2037.

It also aims to support Warrington’s ongoing economic growth by making 362 hectares of employment land available.

The minimum number of new homes set by the Government exceeds the amount of urban and brownfield land available in Warrington. The plan, therefore, proposes unlocking some areas of Green Belt land for development to provide more homes and employment land.

In proposing the Draft Local Plan Cllr Judith Guthrie (LAB) said she understood peoples concerns but the council had a “statutory duty to produce it” or face the consequences of the Government taking control.

In seconding the proposal council leader Russ Bowden said : “The most important part of the Local Plan is retaining control!”

He added that Warrington was not unique and the only authority facing the loss of Green Belt.

“We are all residents of Warrington and value the Green Belt,” he added. “We have sought where possible to use brownfield sites and infill. Development of the green Belt is an absolute last resort for this council and we have done everything we can to find alternative sites.”

Cllr Bowden added that he had no issue with the votes being recorded.

Opposing the plan Cllr Ryan Bate,(Lib Dem) said: “Tonight’s debate is a critical step in the process of approving the Local Plan, so in effect it is a debate about the future of our borough. And we appreciate that producing a Local Plan always involves compromise and often controversy, so whilst we disagree with many of the proposals in the Plan, my group would like to express our gratitude to the officers involved in this process.

“The Liberal Democrats fully recognise the need for Warrington to have a robust Local Plan. We recognise that Warrington cannot stand still. There is an urgent need for housing, especially housing that is truly affordable. There is a need for employment land. There is a great need to address our current infrastructure failings and we also have a moral obligation to redress the social and economic inequalities across our town.

“Unfortunately, we do not believe that the draft Local Plan we have before us will achieve those things. And in a rare show of unity, politicians from Labour and the Conservatives, together with my colleagues in the Liberal Democrats have all expressed concerns about the proposals of the Local Plan.”

Cllr Bob Barr (Lib Dem) added: “This plan is based on a watered-down version of the motherhood and apple pie “vision” for Warrington that no one could disagree with, but which pays scant attention to Warrington’s unique characteristics nor does it provide any distinctive vision of the future for the town.

“We ask the Executive Board members responsible to take this plan away and discuss it with the communities that are going to be affected.

“We welcome the New Leader’s commitment to consultation. So, do it by taking this plan into the communities affected to find out what is wanted, what is acceptable and what can be delivered.

“Presenting this plan as a done deal in the Halliwell Jones Stadium will not be enough. Warrington deserves better!”

The plan will now go out for consultation for an eight week period, starting in April.




About Author

Experienced journalist for more than 35 years. Managing Director of magazine publishing group with six in-house titles and on-line daily newspaper for Warrington. Experienced writer, photographer, PR consultant and media expert having written for local, regional and national newspapers. Specialties: PR, media, social networking, photographer, networking, advertising, sales, media crisis management. Patron Tim Parry Johnathan Ball Foundation for Peace. Trustee Warrington Disability Partnership. Former Chairman of Warrington Town FC.


  1. Proud to be raising the Warrington Nature Conservation Forum banner (a tad rough and ready – a rush job on the dining room table) up high and next to the Peel Hall one (which I couldn’t lift up) which I’ve been involved in since 1999.
    Why don’t councillors and council officers understand the damage that they are about to inflict over the next twenty years.
    It was not what I was taught in Coventry University (aka Lanchester Poly) during my degree in Geography and Economics back in the mid 70’s. A certain Director Andy Farrell was there two years later doing planning I think. why are our visions poles apart. Why did he axe the Natural Environmental Post at the Council? Axe the WNCF page set up under agenda 21, I spent sometime in 2016 during my Mayoral Year helping redesign the WNCF page on the council web site using my 30 years IT experience and then it was pulled after 4 weeks without any consultation.
    The good news is that with RIMAGs assistance and Paul Speake’s input on our behalf we have a new Web site http://www.wncf.co.uk – there is still the Facebook page that Helen Lacy set up and as per our members remit we are attempting to scrutinise planning stuff – a role put out to the Manchester Ecology Unit based I think in Tameside. Everything is blamed on austerity.

    Chair of the
    Warrington Nature Conservation Forum
    Geoff Settle

  2. What a shame that my local councillors didn’t stand up and be counted and state AGAINST – does this mean that they are not supporting the fight against Peel Hall or have to abstain because that is the only way out for them under Labour Group instructions?

    • Well if the Labour group all vote on major decisions like this in the way they are told, what’s the point of having them? Just replace the entire elected council with one person and have done.

Leave A Comment