Incinerator will benefit town!

2

COUNCIL bosses have hit back at claims by Warrington North MP Helen Hones that they will not come clean over plans for an incinerator in the town.
They claim an Energy from Waste Plant will actually bring benefits to Warrington.
Coun Alan Litton, Executive Board Member for the Environment, (pictured right) said: “She is dredging up old news in an attempt to score cheap political points. When we published our Waste Management Strategy in June 2008, we made it very clear we favoured an ‘energy from waste’ plant. The MP likes to call this an incinerator to alarm residents and
grab headlines by scaremongering, and she knows it.
“One of the biggest challenges we face is the need to stop sending our waste to landfill sites. Since we took over the Council nearly four years ago, recycling rates have increased massively from 19% to 47%.
“This is great news and all credit to local people but we need to find a way of recovering value from the remaining waste. A modern ‘energy from waste’ incinerator will do just that by burning the rubbish we cannot recycle. A combined heat and power plant can supply hot water and heating to local homes and local businesses as well
as generating electricity for the grid. It will produce less toxic emissions in a year than one small bonfire on bonfire night.”
Leader of the Council Ian Marks added: “The MP appears to disagree with the views of her Government’s Environment Secretary, Hilary Benn, who supports energy from
waste plants. At the end of last month he gave an interview when he said that for European countries with low landfill rates, it is energy from waste that makes the
difference. He went on to say that if you can find a way of taking the heat that is generated as well as the energy, then you have got a double benefit for society.
“Surely our MP supports sustainable energy in Warrington rather than dumping loads more waste into landfill?”
Earlier this week Ms Jones (pictured left) called for the Council to come clean on their plans for an incinerator.
She said the council’s budget consultation document revealed they were still planning an incinerator for the town with a provision of £200,000 each year, for the next three years, to develop an “energy from waste” plant.
She said: “This is an incinerator by another name. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is a duck.
“The council have serious questions to answer. Do they still plan to put an incinerator on Omega? If so, why won’t they say so? If not, where is it going? Residents deserve the truth.”


2 Comments
Share.

About Author

Experienced journalist for more than 40 years. Managing Director of magazine publishing group with three in-house titles and on-line daily newspaper for Warrington. Experienced writer, photographer, PR consultant and media expert having written for local, regional and national newspapers. Specialties: PR, media, social networking, photographer, networking, advertising, sales, media crisis management. Chair of Warrington Healthwatch Director Warrington Chamber of Commerce Patron Tim Parry Johnathan Ball Foundation for Peace. Trustee Warrington Disability Partnership. Former Chairman of Warrington Town FC.

2 Comments

  1. Don’t we already have an incinerator in Warrington, it’s called the crematorium, there aren’t howls of protest over that, yet until recently when they introduced extra filters, burning bodies with mercury fillings in them and chipboard coffins was pretty polluting, and probably if the truth be known still is.

  2. I have no objections to an incinerator…I do have objections to the way the council are saying that Helen Jones (and I’ve done my fair share of attacking her flannel in the past, so not exactly defending her) is scaremongering by using the word “Incinerator” when in fact its not an incinerator at all… its an “Energy from waste……….erm incinerator”. It’s typical council flannel to hide true agendas. An incinerator is an incinerator stop trying to LIE to the public, we don’t appreciate it. your best defence would have been to say “YES ITS AN INCINERATOR, BUT A MODERN, ENVIRONMENT FRIENDLY ONE”, instead we get all this rubbish about it not being an incinerator but an “energy from waste plant”.

Leave A Comment