Warrington-Worldwide.co.uk incorporates the Village Life, Culcheth Life, Frodsham Life & Lymm Life magazines.

Deputy Leader urges officers to remove Burtonwood housing allocation from Draft Local Plan

3

DEPUTY leader of Warrington Borough Council Cllr. Cathy Mitchell is urging officers to remove controversial proposals to build 160 homes on green space in Burtonwood village from the Draft Local Plan.

It follows a recent planning application to build 300 homes on land which had previously been allocated for offices at nearby Omega – both areas she represents in the Burtonwood and Winwick Ward.

Backed by Leader of the Council Cllr. Russ Bowden, she has now requested that the proposed allocation in Burtonwood be removed from the Draft Local Plan, following a large response from residents in relation to the recent consultation.

The draft local plan has earmarked 160 houses in the village, on land between Phipps Lane and Green Lane, opposite Burtonwood Community Primary School.

Cllr. Mitchell said: “I have been working on this issue for some time now. I learned just over a week ago that a planning application has been submitted for a further 300 houses on Omega, which falls within my ward. This is on a site which presently has planning permission for offices. The additional houses are not presently accounted for in the draft Local Plan.

“I fully understand the strength of feeling in Burtonwood, particularly given the proposals in St Helens draft Local Plan for housing in Gorsey Lane and Bold. I have therefore asked officers to remove the current Burtonwood allocation from the draft Local Plan if planning permission is granted. I understand that they are taking advice on this.”

Cllr. Russ Bowden, Leader of the Council said: “I fully support Cathy in this action – this is a brownfield site that must be used ahead of green belt. We are also in talks with St Helens Council to push back on their proposals for development on Gorsey Lane and Bold and discussing planned developments in Parkside, which could clearly have an impact on Winwick residents. I pay tribute to Cathy’s dedication in trying to finding a solution for residents, following the large number of responses to the Local Plan consultation.”

Last year more than 1,000 local residents set up an action group opposing the proposed development in the draft local plan saying it was an “abuse of green space.”

Any proposed changes to the Draft Local Plan would have to be consulted on again locally, prior to a council vote and moving it to the next stage.

1,000 oppose “abuse of green space” at Burtonwood

Share.

About Author

Experienced journalist for more than 35 years. Managing Director of magazine publishing group with six in-house titles and on-line daily newspaper for Warrington. Experienced writer, photographer, PR consultant and media expert having written for local, regional and national newspapers. Specialties: PR, media, social networking, photographer, networking, advertising, sales, media crisis management. Patron Tim Parry Johnathan Ball Foundation for Peace. Trustee Warrington Disability Partnership. Former Chairman of Warrington Town FC.

3 Comments

  1. Whilst I approve of the desire to remove this land from the Local Plan, it’s only a tiny fraction of the land which should never have been in the Local Plan in the first place.

    Who is responsible for the Local Plan? Cllrs Bowden and Mitchell! They whipped their councillors to support the plan.

    This is pure electioneering. They created a mess and now want some points for rectifying a small percentage of the mess just before a by-election.

      • Indeed, Positron. Given the way the GE went, and the wafer-thin majority in Warrington North, there must be some anxious folks in W’ton Labour at the moment.

        The by-election will be interesting, but not half as significant as the all-out fight in May. Moving to all-out elections might have seemed a good idea when it happened, but right now they must be questioning it. We could easily find the current Labour group in a coalition after 7th May, which would force a great deal more disclosure of information about investments, not to say a fresh look at the local plan.

Reply To Jim Cancel Reply