warrington worldwide, warrington's online daily newspaper
 
Author Message
<  Political Soapbox  ~  PR?
LymmParent
PostPosted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 9:59 pm  Reply with quote



Joined: 24 Jun 2009
Posts: 2031

If everyone ranked candidates in order of preference and then we added up the scores, the only certain outcome is that nobody's first choice would win. The inoffensive little man who came fifth on every paper would slide into number ten as all the hate votes cancelled one another out! Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
observer
PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:26 am  Reply with quote



Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 25773
Location: Warrington

Kyje: isn't that precisely why NuLab have finally come round to considering PR, cos at the end of the day, they are more certain of "second votes" - afraid this STV system would consign us to the same bunch of electoral, all things to all men, centre hugging careerists we've now become accustomed to - so no vision, no grand plan, no conviction, no fundemental change - just the same old grey politics. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lt Kije
PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:24 pm  Reply with quote



Joined: 26 Feb 2008
Posts: 2476
Location: Near

Obs you are correct, I final fling of the dice to hold on to power, If we would have had the system earlier it might have stopped them getting in the first place, One benefit of the system would be that any MP who is elected would need 50% of the vote from his constituency unlike now, It's not perfect but it is fairer than are present system, and unlike PR it would not lead to weak government like in Italy.
_________________
Pro European
Mac User
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Adam
PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 6:40 pm  Reply with quote



Joined: 11 Jul 2002
Posts: 823
Location: Warrington

Of course there is only one perfect form of PR and that is to allow only two Parties. How would the Lib Dems like that I wonder?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paul Kennedy
PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 7:08 pm  Reply with quote



Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 10476
Location: Hatton, Stretton & Walton

Lt Kije wrote:
Obs you are correct, I final fling of the dice to hold on to power, If we would have had the system earlier it might have stopped them getting in the first place, One benefit of the system would be that any MP who is elected would need 50% of the vote from his constituency unlike now, It's not perfect but it is fairer than are present system, and unlike PR it would not lead to weak government like in Italy.


Not an MP (but that's another story Very Happy ), when I stood in the locals in 2008, I did actually get 50% of the vote......just. I got 503 and the others totalled 502. Mind you I've got the smallest vote in the Town Hall...and the smallest majority...but then it is the smalled Ward. Wink Very Happy

Regarding MPs, locally Mrs Jones got 53% of the vote in 2005, whilst Mrs Southworth got 41%...the MP for Knowsley got 77% of the vote...bit greedy if you ask me. Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
observer
PostPosted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:41 am  Reply with quote



Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 25773
Location: Warrington

But you also need to factor in "non-voters"; we can have candidates an Governments elected on a lot less than 50% of the eligible electorate - so no perfect system I.m afraid. The two main Parties ignore the aspirations of their core voters in any event, in the fight over marginal seats - so we finish up with pretty much the same thing but with a different title. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lt Kije
PostPosted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:54 pm  Reply with quote



Joined: 26 Feb 2008
Posts: 2476
Location: Near

I don't agree you would need more of the popular vote to get elected, so it is more democratic
_________________
Pro European
Mac User
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
observer
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:12 am  Reply with quote



Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 25773
Location: Warrington

How do you work that out Kyje, if 30% of folk arn't even bothering to vote at all? Confused
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lt Kije
PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:33 pm  Reply with quote



Joined: 26 Feb 2008
Posts: 2476
Location: Near

Do what they do in Australia, you have to vote Wink
_________________
Pro European
Mac User
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
observer
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:45 am  Reply with quote



Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 25773
Location: Warrington

But that's not part of the current Gov proposal. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lt Kije
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 3:41 pm  Reply with quote



Joined: 26 Feb 2008
Posts: 2476
Location: Near

It should be Wink
_________________
Pro European
Mac User
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
observer
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 12:16 am  Reply with quote



Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 25773
Location: Warrington

There are lots of "should be's" in this world I'm afraid! Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

View next topic
View previous topic
Page 2 of 2
Goto page Previous  1, 2
warrington worldwide Forum Index  ~  Political Soapbox

Post new topic   Reply to topic


 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB and Conundrum v1.02